Saturday, August 09, 2008

 

Herriman Saturday



Not to stretch a point, but after seeing last night's coverage of the Olympics opening ceremonies I can't help but draw a parallel with our Herriman Saturdays. The actual event was obviously spectacular but we only got to see it through a glass darkly. The coverage last night was utterly horrendous, with more commercial breaks than actual coverage, and the camera work was so awful that you often only got the vaguest sense of what was going on. What's your problem NBC?

Our Herriman Saturday scans are much the same. Trust me that between having to work off of microfilm photocopies, and the pathetic resolution of monitors limiting the detail, you are only seeing a watered down representation of Herriman's genius in these posts.

Today's first cartoon is from April 9 1907, and it headlined a full page story about the Examiner providing free rides to 4000 children to go see the Sells-Floto circus that is in town. No free circus tickets, just transport.

The other two cartoons are from Sunday the 14th. The first is in regard to one of the many athletic events organized under the Hearst banner. I believe there are still athletic events at USC under the auspices of the Hearst organization. This one was strictly for schoolkids and looks like everyone must have had a blast.

Finally, Herriman heralds the spring when a young man's fancy turns not so much to love as the hankering to buy a car.

All three of these cartoons were full page width.

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment

Friday, August 08, 2008

 

Obscurity of the Day: Omar Jr.



Sidney's Smith's Ching Chow panel did gangbuster business after being introduced in January 1927, so here's one of the inevitable me-too features. Thornton Fisher, a fellow whose many obscure features make him a regular guest on our Obscurity of the Day, contributed this one. Switching from an Asian sage to a Middle Eastern savant, Fisher's Omar Jr. jiggled the Ching Chow formula a little by illustrating the wise man's sayings rather than just depicting the title character over and over like in Smith's feature.

Omar Jr. was created sometime in 1927 and lasted until at least January 1928. It was syndicated by the Philadelphia Ledger who ran it in their unsuccessful tabloid venture, the Philadelphia Sun. I've never seen it appearing anywhere else.

A tip of the turban to Cole Johnson who supplied all the info on this feature.

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment

Thursday, August 07, 2008

 

News of Yore 1952: Napoleon Moves to the Coast


"Napoleon" Strip Moves To Mirror Syndicate
By Erwin Knoll (E&P, 9/20/52)

The "Napoleon and Uncle Elby" strip, one of the old-timers on newspaper comic pages, gets a new syndicate outlet next month. Mir­ror Enterprises Syndicate, Los Angeles, will handle distribution of the strip beginning with the daily release for Oct. 13 and the Sunday release for Oct. 19. Lafave Newspaper Features, Cleveland, has serviced the strip since its inception 20 years ago.

"Napoleon" nearly wound up on the scrap heap of dead newspaper features last year when its original creator, Clifford McBride, died. Subscribing editors, aware of the strip's distinctive art style and old-time flavor, saw little possibility of its continuation. But Margot McBride, the artist's widow, was determined not to let the strip die.

She hired Roger Armstrong, a former student and assistant of her husband's, to draw the strip, and herself took on the job of conceiving ideas, writing dialogue and supervising the art work. To­gether they maintain the style of Mr. McBride's old-time art and humor, despite the fact that Mrs. McBride is 29 and he 34.

As proof of their success Rex Barley, manager of MES, cites the fact that some papers which dropped the strip at the time of Mr. McBride's death have re­turned to the fold, while new ones have been added.

Labels:


Comments:
Not on today's topic...
With the death of Jack Kamen, I was wondering if his (and George Thatcher's) comic strip "Inspector Dayton" ever appeared in newspapers.
I notice you don't have it in the Mystery Strips, but I haven't found anything to assure me that it actually ran in the papers.
 
the only comment I can make it that Mrs. McBride was nine when Napoleon started? hmm....
refresh our memory how long did it run by Armstrong?
 
DD - After an initial run in 1938-39 the Eisner-Iger shop's Inspector Dayton strip was later advertised in E&P in 1942, 45-46, 48-50 by Pan-American Press Service as a daily and Sunday feature. It was still credited to George Thatcher and I've never found it running anywhere. I have a photocopy of the original art to one daily from this period which does indeed have Jack Kamen art. My guess is that it was actually being produced and was running in some foreign paper(s).

The feature was advertised one more time, in 1974, by Jerry Iger's Phoenix Features, obviously now offered in reprints.

Steven - Napoleon was put down in 1960. And I don't know if Clifford had himself a child bride or if Margot subscribed to the Jack Benny school of age reporting. From the grainy pic I'm gonna guess the latter.

--Allan
 
in the for what it's worth department, she wasn't the first bride of McBride. I havent been inspired enough to see what happened to the first Mrs. McBride.
 
Post a Comment

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

 

Obscurity of the Day: Uncle Jim and Tad and Tim

Clare Victor Dwiggins, or 'Dwig' as he was commonly known, had a very long and distinguished career as a cartoonist. He was a New York World headliner in the oughts but then in 1912 for reasons unknown he moved over to the McClure syndicate. McClure was on very shaky ground in these years; their preprint Sunday comic sections which had been very popular were beginning to lose clients at a fast clip. Dwig was probably wooed away from Pulitzer with the thinking that he might help them to hold on to their diminishing client list.

Dwig created a page that featured today's obscurity, Uncle Jim and Tad and Tim, as a half page strip along with Mrs. Bump's Boarding House. The page debuted on January 12 1913. Apparently the presence of Dwig was not the draw that could save the McClure section because in the 1913-14 period the client list for the McClure section continued to dwindle.

My guess is that McClure might have been their own worst enemy in this period. It's pretty common to find papers switching to the McClure section only to switch again to another syndicate within a few weeks or months. Perhaps McClure's distribution system was unreliable, perhaps they couldn't compete with the pricing from other syndicates. Whatever it was, they seemed to be letting major paper clients slip through their fingers.

Uncle Jim and Tad and Tim is a deliciously pleasant trifle -- Jim and his two young nephews are like the Katzies on Prozac. The kids get into some minor mischief, or Jim plays a trick on the kids, but the action is so low key and the bonhomie of the characters so heartfelt that the overall impression is that the players just got together on a languorous Sunday afternoon to entertain us with some little tableau that they all cooked up together.

By 1914 Uncle Jim and Tad and Tim is appearing in so few papers and so irregularly and sporadically that it is all but impossible to tell when the last strip was offered. My best guess is an end date of September 13 1914 (found in the Atlanta Constitution). But they could have been running it late ... anyone have some corroborating data to share?

Labels:


Comments:
Hi. Hoping you can help me. In the 1950's , there was in the Sunday comics, a set of drawings of various characters with descriptions underneath the drawing which were in circles or boxes. They were mostly shoulders up black and white faces of people you might see around-really detailed and interesting characters. It was in the Star Ledger or one of those papers my Dad used to get. I have tried to find anyone who remembers them as I would love to know who drew them and the name of the "strip". Wish I could describe them better but I was very young at the time. Please help if you can. Thanks. Pat
 
Sounds to me like you may be looking for "Among Us Mortals" by W.E. Hill.

--Allan
 
Post a Comment

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

 

News of Yore: Goldberg on Editorial Cartooning


Seriously Speaking of Comic Artists
By R. L. (Rube) Goldberg (Circulation, April 1923)

Why have the present day comics superseded the old-fashioned political cartoons in public favor? By political cartoonists I mean the artists before the day of the inspired pens of Winsor McCay, Tom Powers, Opper, Harry Mayshy, Williams and the like.

I'm not sure that I know the answer, so I'll tell you all about it.

It was not an unusual thing, when I started in the newspaper game, for a kind friend to ask me with a look of pity in his eye and a sympathetic tremble in his voice, "Do you expect to go in for something serious and big and really worthwhile like political cartooning some day?" I was just an insignificant lowbrow drawing idi­otic beings with putty noses and lumpy heads. The famous men of the day were dealing with national subjects in their car­toons. No newspaper cartoon was consid­ered great unless it included one or all of the following symbols: the Republican elephant; the Democratic mule; Uncle Sam; the goddess of Justice; the earth; Father Time; George Washington; Abra­ham Lincoln; and the Dawn of a new Era.

The few comic artists whose daily car­toons were being published at that time were looked upon as youthful freaks who appealed to a low order of intelligence with their odd creations. The work seemed to have no definite purpose other than to give the heavy thinker a little relaxation by let­ting him see the results of the workings of a disordered brain. The comics were not believed to have any relation to human life as it really exists.

The comic artist was supposed to be de­veloping himself with his pen so that some day he could draw a picture of the White House or something else that had a little sense to it. All his preparatory work in the comic line was a total loss.

Of course, there were great political car­toonists in those days. And there are a few today. But people were inclined to gauge the bigness of a man's work by the greatness of the symbols he employed rath­er than by the work itself and the idea in back of it all. A cartoonist could draw a picture of the President of the United States looking at Niagara Falls and call it "Why Not?" and people would say it's big stuff because he handled great subjects. A man who drew pictures of United States Senators was a greater cartoonist than a man who drew pictures of police judges.

As for the comic artist who drew pic­tures of people and things that had no fancy titles at all, he was just a plain nut.

If anyone tells you that the world hasn't gone ahead a little at least, just tell him he's talking through his brown fedora.

People have learned that the comic art­ist is not shooting at the moon. He is try­ing to hit something that is very near you — in fact somewhere inside of you near the heart. The seemingly small things that he centers his drawings around are really much bigger than the Republican elephant and the Democratic mule. They are as big as life itself. And they are much closer to the average man than any composite pic­ture of the whole universe.

The newspaper readers seem to have got­ten wise to some of the political bunk at least. They won't bother about a political cartoon now unless they know there is a good idea in back of it. You can show them a whole row of Uncle Sams and in­stead of saying, " Isn't it wonderful!" they will ask, "How do you play it?"

The comic man is out of the nut class because people now know that the symbols he uses are really the symbols of human nature. They are very definite and they strike home. They are the smallest and at the same time the biggest things we know. Why, once in a while, they even ask us to come to dinners and meetings and say something!

Don't think for a minute I'm trying to convey the idea that a comic artist is a man with a message. Heaven forbid! We'll leave that distinction to visiting statesmen from Europe.

But the home folks know what we are getting at and no one ever asks any more when we expect to branch out into something big like political cartooning.

I met three political cartoonists yester­day who were trying to get into the comic game.

[of course it turns out that Rube was making jokes on himself in this article since he eventually decided that he wanted to be an editorial cartoonist and forsook the comic strippers' fraternity]

Labels:


Comments:
And won a Pulitzer, no less! (New York Sun, '49, I think.)
 
Allan,
I would love to reprint this in the next issue of Stay Tooned! Magazine. May I?
 
Hi John -
Anything labeled "News of Yore" on my blog is a reprint of a vintage article so I make no claim to it.

--Allan
 
Post a Comment

Monday, August 04, 2008

 

Obscurity of the Day: Chaos


Chaos may have just been another in the parade of Far Side wannabes, but the feature and its creator have an interesting biography.

Brian Shuster claimed to have created Chaos in 1989, but the earliest evidence I can find for its existence is in 1994 when it was being offered by Daily Features Syndicate of Los Angeles. Although Editor & Publisher talked of it as if it were a real syndicate, complete with marketing manager spokesman, a little Google sleuthing revealed that the syndicate was actually based in a private home on a residential street in LA.

So presumably Shuster was self-syndicating his Far Side knockoff, a seven day a week feature in which the Sunday was little more than a color daily (see above). But Shuster had a knack for marketing. When Gary Larson announced that he was retiring his feature, Shuster started a marketing campaign guaranteed to both get him clients and infuriate Larson and his syndicate.

Shuster sent out a marketing piece to prospective clients in which a letter from Gary Larson himself said that Chaos was the feature that he endorsed for taking over his spot. Only problem was that the Larson who penned the letter was not the Gary Larson, just a guy Shuster picked out of the LA phone book.

Shuster claimed it was all meant as a light-hearted joke and nothing came of Universal's threats of a lawsuit. It did, however, seem to work like a charm. Shuster boasted in 1995 that he now had 220 client papers for his feature, an astounding number in the fractured marketplace looking for Far Side replacements.

With that number of papers taking his feature it was inevitable that the major syndicates would come calling, and King Features carried away the dubious prize of Chaos. Only problem was that Shuster seemed to already be losing interest in working on it himself. He later claimed that by this time he just wrote the gags and had several cartoonists drawing the panels. Note on the samples above the credit to "PanGaniBan".

King Features dropped the feature in 1996 after a very short run and Shuster went back to self-syndication. He was now more focused on the internet, though. Shuster started a site running his Chaos cartoons and also started some porno websites. Chaos finally ended in 1998, but the porn sites lived on. Facing a huge number of competitors in that market, Shuster realized that he needed to bring his mind for marketing to bear on the problem of gaining traffic.

Shuster was apparently a technical whiz as well as full of marketing savvy. Though few know his name, he was quite possibly the most hated man in America for several years because Brian Shuster has the distinction of having created the web pop-up ad. Though he failed to properly protect the idea and thus didn't become a zillionaire, few are interested in disputing the claim that he was the first to annoy millions of users with those incessantly appearing gimmicks.

The pop-up porn king eventually left all that behind him and is now running a virtual reality social networking site called utherverse.com.

You can read an interview with Shuster here: Porn's Prince of Pop-Ups Speaks.

Labels:


Comments:
I've just found here so many strips I've ever read!
 
Post a Comment

Sunday, August 03, 2008

 

Jim Ivey's Sunday Comics


Order Jim Ivey's new book Cartoons I Liked at Lulu.com or order direct from Ivey and get the book autographed with a free original sketch.

Labels:


Comments:
How much fun would it have been to smoke a stogie [and I don't even smoke] and listen to Jim and Jack exchange stories? Oh, the legends I could have built!
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

Tell me when this blog is updated

what is this?